Basic Facts
Producing Organization : Stephen Eich, Joan Stein, Leavitt/Fox Theatricals/Mages
Theatre: Promenade Theatre
New York, New York
October 6, 1995- May 26, 1996
Director: Randall Arney
Designers:
Set: Scott Bradley
Lighting: Kevin Rigdon
"Martin's gift for punnery and zingers -- not to mention farce and polemic -- can only shadow Stoppard's, but it's real enough. A larger problem is that we can imagine the author playing every one of these denizens of the Lapin Agile, including an alter kocker (Carl Don) with a busy bladder, and Germaine (Rondi Reed, splendid as the voice of reason), Freddy's helpmate who lectures Picasso: 'You will never have to earn a woman and you will never appreciate a woman.' "
JEREMY GERARD, Variety
http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117904607.html?categoryid=33&cs=1y.com/review/VE1117904607.html?categoryid=33&cs=1
"The last 15 minutes of the play become slowly more and more desperate. The ideas that have been touched upon turn into fudge. Mr. Martin's manner is to so mix the sublime with the ridiculous that they cant be easily disentangled."
VINCENT CANBY, The New York Times.
Oct 23, 1995
Production 2
Basic Facts
Producing Organization: Stephen Eich, Joan Stein, Leavitt/Fox
Theatre: Steppenwolf
Chicago, Illinois
Wed. October 13, 1993 — Thu. May 12, 1994
Director: Randall Arney
Designers:
Set: Scott Bradley
Lighting: Kevin Rigdon

"This points to Martin's ultimate, yet unclear, point. A refined intellectual still pegged with a "wild and crazy guy" reputation, he's exploring the struggle between being a genius or just famous, between epochal ideas and mere notions, between the optimism of the new and the skepticism of the familiar. It's an ambitious agenda, one that Martin never quite sorts out, even if the actors turn in spirited, convincing performances."
Jonathan Taylor, Variety
October 30, 1993
"Steve Martin's "Picasso at the Lapin Agile" demonstrates the well-known actor/comedian/author can write funny. But Martin hasn't been able to get beyond the often corny jokes to create a satisfying play. By the time its 80-minute running time is over, "Picasso" is done in by superficial stabs at character development, the absence of a coherent, compelling storyline and a coarsely directed production that merely emphasizes the work's faults."
Lewis Lazare, Daily Variety
October 25, 1993 Monday
Production 3
Basic Facts
Producing organization: The Arden Theatre Company
Theatre: The Arden Theatre
Philadelphia, PA
03/01/2001-04/01/2001
Director: Aaron Posner
Designers:
Scenic Design: Bob Phillips
Costume Design: Marla Jurglani
"The Lapin Agile depicted here doesn't have a turn of the century Parisian flavor, although its crazy, modern air could have inhabited a place frequented by futuristic thinkers and free thinking artists. It's imbued with the spirit of something new on the horizon, but a far cry from 1904 Montmartre because of its myriad winking references and humorous insights which would have been quite impossible to foresee in those days. Martin has a ball with the dialogue and he throws around a lot of funny material, both lightweight and nearly bordering on profound. The play is also about attraction, creativity, and ideas that didn't work as well as ideas that did."
Katheryn Oselund, http://www.curtainup.com/tainup.com/
http://www.curtainup.com/picasso.html
"Picasso at the Lapin Agile, playwright Steve Martin's idea of what might have happened if Pablo Picasso and Albert Einstein had met as unknowns at a celebrated Montmartre cafe in 1904, is too funny for you to ruin your ride home with philosophical inquiry. Better to rehash the show's most risible lines and situations, which should occupy the entire trip and then some."
Clifford A. Ridley, The Philadelphia Inquirer
MARCH 8, 2001
Production 4
Basis facts
Producing organization: The Commonweal Theatre Company
Theatre: The Commonweal Theatre Company
Lanesboro, MN
May 14, 2010- September 25, 2010
Director: Zach Curtis
Designers
Set Designer: Kit Mayer
Sound designer: Stan Peal
"Steve Martin has much to say about art, science and the future. This is a deep piece people weren't quite expecting from him, but he's not above cheap humor, either"
TERRY RINDFLEISCH, Lacross Tribune
May 9, 2010
"Picasso at the Lapin Agile" which is currently running at the commonweal Theatre in Lanesboro, is a carnival of ideas, half-baked schemes and moments of sheer wonder following one after the other. The audience- and actors- are left to grasp what they can as it zooms past."
Tom Weber, Post Bulletin
June 7, 2010
Production 5
Basic Facts
Producing Organization: Two Rivers Theatre Company
Theatre: Two Rivers Theatre
Red Bank, New Jersey
May 31, 2010- June 13, 2010
Director: Hal Brooks
Designers:
Costume: Kirche Leigh Zeile
Set: Donyale Werle
"Lapin Agile (it means nimble rabbit) is short on plot, but it sets a tantalizing mood. For those of us who greeted the new millennium with a countdown to the planet's ruin, it's awfully pleasant to spend time with characters at the dawn of a new century who are optimistic, even entranced by the future's grand possibilities. That doesn't mean the subject won't be treated irreverently."
Anita Gates, New York Times
June 1, 2010
"A sharp and energetic cast is performing Steve Martin's hilarious stand-up absurdist comedy of a play Picasso at the Lapin Agile with brio at the Two River Theatre in Red Bank. Martin's dialogue will keep your mind happily engaged as you try to keep up with it. If you would like to have your brain teased by an adroit wordsmith with an off-beat sense of humor, look no further for delightful entertainment."
Bob Rendall, http://www.talkinbroadway.com/
http://www.talkinbroadway.com/regional/nj/nj404.html
Production 6
Basic Facts
Producing Organization: New Rep Theatre Company
Theatre: New Rep Theatre
Boston, Massachusetts
April 19- May 10, 2010
Director: Daniel Gidron
Designers:
Set: Cristina Todesco
Sound: Dewey Delay

Statement
With Picasso at the Lapin Agile the production problems aren't really the physical and technical problems of most shows. Most of the problems lye in the dialogue and characters. For one the show is heavily dipped in history. In 1904 there was quite a lot going on in the world of art and science, some more obvious than others. In order for the show to have it's full effect it's important for the audience to get most of the references and boy, there are a lot. Everyone will know who Picasso and Einstein are, but will they know of Apollinaire or Max Plank? Not to mention that the play, at sometimes, can move at a lightning fast speed. Another problem is that the play is almost completely Steve Martin. Usually that would be a good thing, the only problem is you could see him play every single character! That’s not to say that there aren't any technical issues in the show. On the contrary, there are three rather large ones, like the entrance of the Visitor. The Visitor enters near the end of the play mysteriously from the bathroom. Another problem would be when the Visitor shows Picasso the Les Demoiselles d'Avignon. It involves a painting of sheep on a hill transforming into the Les Demoiselles d'Avignon. The final problem from a technical standpoint would be at the end of the show the roof of the bar is supposed to come flying off!
The production problems posed by our context aren't that terrifying. For one the show was originally produced in a studio theatre, so doing it in the showcase shouldn't be a huge problem. The main problem I foresee about the showcase would be when the "Sheep on the Hill" transforms into the Les Demoiselles d'Avignon. If we were to do that effect with projections, that would ultimately dictate the entire position of the set. The problem I'm most worried about is the audience. I'm not saying that our audience here at Sam Houston State University is slow, and I'm not saying our audience is unintelligent. All I'm saying is that I don't think our audience is very "art" focused. While we do have a number of art majors at SHSU, most of the students here are majoring in Criminal Justice and Business. And I feel that most of the town folk aren't very art focused either and a lot of jokes and references and points may be lost upon them.
Other productions have done a lot to solve some of these problems. For instance the problem of the Les Demoiselles d'Avignon transformation. This tricky situation was for the most part handled with a simple projection technique. I had an idea, though I haven't decided yet if it is to goofy to follow through with, that the Visitor would walk up to the "Sheep painting" and pull a string and the Les Demoiselles d'Avignon would come down like an old-school window shade. As for the Visitor's entrance one production had strange noises coming from the bathroom and used lights and fog to show "time-travel". As for the roof coming off at the end, one production had built the "rafters" of the Lapin Agile and attached them to a batton, so they could be raised and lowered. That option is not very realistic in our theatre. As for the history, and art references, most theatres put in lobby displays and playbill inserts. One production put in their playbill a number of questions that the audience should be thinking about during the show.
The critics generally responded very well to Picasso at the Lapin Agile. Critiques generally lingered on the script while talking about the specific production for about a paragraph or two. General notes on the script were that it tried to focus on too many things at once, and that while it's concept was high, dealing with the comparison of art and science, it's humor was low, dealing with bathroom jokes. As for the productions almost all of the acting was considered on par, and the design were generally good. One production was criticized for it's set not bringing the essence of Montmartre.










